Radeon RX 5500 XT vs FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5500 XT and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 5500 XT 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1845MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1328 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5500 XT
+6395%
5196
FirePro 2460 Multi View
80
Graphics Card
Dec 2019
Release Date
Apr 2010
Navi
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1607 MHz
Base Clock
-
1845 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
22
Compute Units
1
1408
Shading Units
80
88
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
59.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
162.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
10.39 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
324.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
130W
TDP
17W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 14
GPU Name
Cedar
Navi 14 XTX
(215-0932396)
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.5
Shader Model
5.0
