Radeon RX 470 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 470 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 77% (2130MHz vs 1206MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 211.2GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 470
4940
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+142%
12000
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon RX 470
3679
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+121%
8147
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Radeon RX 470
1701
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+111%
3601
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Feb 2024
Arctic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
926 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1206 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1650 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
211.2GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
2048
Shading Units
2816
128
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
38.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
154.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
4.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
4.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
308.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
AD107
Polaris 10 PRO
(215-0876204)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
