Home Comparison Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1125MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +61%
3723
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
2304

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
2048
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.00 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.00 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.608 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.304 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
30W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
TU117
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
N18P-G61-MP2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net