Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs GeForce GT 435M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 435M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1952 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 435M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+1540%
3723
GeForce GT 435M
227
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2011
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2048
Shading Units
96
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.360 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.440 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
226.6 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
18.88 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
GF106
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
N11E-GE-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1