Home Comparison Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs GeForce GT 130M

Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs GeForce GT 130M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 130M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 130M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +3778%
3723
GeForce GT 130M
96

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2009
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1365 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
2048
Shading Units
32
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
23W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
G96C
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
N10P-GE1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net