Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs T600 Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM T600 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
T600 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (40W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
+19%
2989
T600 Max Q
2500
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
Crystal System
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1792
Shading Units
896
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
40W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
TU117
Amethyst PRO
(216-0872004)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.7