Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs RTX A4000 Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX A4000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A4000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2989
RTX A4000 Max Q
+377%
14280
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
Crystal System
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
780 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
352.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
1792
Shading Units
5120
112
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.6 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.28 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.28 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
80W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
GA104
Amethyst PRO
(216-0872004)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.3
Shader Model
6.8