Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2989
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+313%
12350
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
Crystal System
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
1792
Shading Units
3072
112
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
AD107
Amethyst PRO
(216-0872004)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7