Home Comparison Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs Arc A730M

Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs Arc A730M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 12GB VRAM Arc A730M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Arc A730M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1100MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2989
Arc A730M +126%
6758

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
Crystal System
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
3072
112
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.758 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
80W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
DG2-512
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net