Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs Arc A530M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM Arc A530M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Arc A530M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1300MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2989
Arc A530M
+33%
3994
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2023
Crystal System
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
1536
112
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
12
-
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
65W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
DG2-256
Amethyst PRO
(216-0872004)
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
366 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
