Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs Arc A350M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Arc A350M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
+69%
2989
Arc A350M
1766
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2022
Crystal System
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
RT Cores
6
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.60 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.533 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.766 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
441.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
25W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
DG2-128
Amethyst PRO
(216-0872004)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
