Radeon R9 295X2 vs FirePro V9800P
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800P to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
FirePro V9800P 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+110%
5733
FirePro V9800P
2720
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Sep 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
20
2816
Shading Units
1600
176
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
Cypress
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
5.0
