Radeon R9 295X2 vs FirePro V3700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
2776 additional rendering cores
FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+8857%
5733
FirePro V3700
64
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Aug 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
2
2816
Shading Units
40
176
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
32W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
RV620
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
RV620 GL
(215-0670004)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
