Radeon R9 295X2 vs CMP 40HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (185W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5733
CMP 40HX
+32%
7603
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Feb 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
2816
Shading Units
2304
176
TMUs
144
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
185W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
TU106
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.8