Radeon R9 295X2 vs Arc A770
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5733
Arc A770
+242%
19660
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Oct 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
4096
176
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
DG2-512
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
