Radeon R9 295X2 vs Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+86%
5733
Arc A350
3072
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
25W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
DG2-128
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
