Radeon R9 280 vs H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 300W)
H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 66% (1550MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
+40%
3344
H3C XG310
2381
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Nov 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
827 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
2x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
DG1
Tahiti PRO3
(215-0821330)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
Unknown
352 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
