Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs CMP 30HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 93% (1785MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1894
CMP 30HX
+165%
5027
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Feb 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
1024
Shading Units
1408
64
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU116
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8