Home Comparison Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs Arc A780

Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs Arc A780

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)
Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 138% (2200MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1894
Arc A780 +851%
18020

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
2200 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
DG2-512
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net