Home Comparison Radeon R7 360 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

Radeon R7 360 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
1613
Moore Threads MTT S3000 +864%
15560

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
32
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
256
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
22 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net