Radeon R7 360 vs H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1550MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
1613
H3C XG310
+47%
2381
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Nov 2020
Pirate Islands
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
DG1
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
160 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
6.4
