Radeon R7 360 vs FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
+61%
1613
FireStream 9250
1000
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
10
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
RV770
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
