Home Comparison Radeon R7 360 vs FirePro W9100

Radeon R7 360 vs FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 275W)
FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
1613
FirePro W9100 +224%
5238
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R7 360
1371
FirePro W9100 +159%
3552

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Mar 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
44
768
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
275W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
Hawaii
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net