Radeon R7 360 vs FirePro V8800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 208W)
FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
1613
FirePro V8800
+63%
2640
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
20
768
Shading Units
1600
48
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
208W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
Cypress
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
5.0
