Radeon R7 360 vs FirePro V3900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
+158%
1613
FirePro V3900
624
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Feb 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
6
768
Shading Units
480
48
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
Turks
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
5.0
