Radeon R7 360 vs FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
1613
FirePro S9300 X2
+395%
7987
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Mar 2016
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
64
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
6.0
