Home Comparison Radeon R7 360 vs FireGL V3600

Radeon R7 360 vs FireGL V3600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360 +1020%
1613
FireGL V3600
144

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
3
768
Shading Units
120
48
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
73W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
RV630
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net