Radeon R7 250E vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250E and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 250E 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 300W)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
17664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250E
819
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+11018%
91060
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R7 250E
561
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+4577%
26240
Graphics Card
Dec 2013
Release Date
Dec 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
512
Shading Units
18176
32
TMUs
568
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
819.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
51.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Cape Verde
GPU Name
AD102
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
AD102
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
