Radeon R7 250 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 130W)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
717
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+3628%
26730
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R7 250
561
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+2456%
14340
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
512
Shading Units
6144
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Cape Verde
GPU Name
AD104
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8