Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
717
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+297%
2849
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R7 250
561
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+535%
3566
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
512
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cape Verde
GPU Name
TU117
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
