Home Comparison Radeon R7 240 vs RTX 5880 Ada Generation

Radeon R7 240 vs RTX 5880 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 48GB VRAM RTX 5880 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 285W)
RTX 5880 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 215% (2460MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
13760 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
499
RTX 5880 Ada Generation +13781%
69270

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jan 2024
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
975 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
2460 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
110
320
Shading Units
14080
20
TMUs
440
8
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
440
-
RT Cores
110
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
433.0 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1082 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
69.27 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
69.27 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1082 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
285W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
AD102
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
AD102
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net