Radeon R7 240 vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 188% (2250MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
499
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+4517%
23040
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
730 MHz
Base Clock
1725 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
320
Shading Units
5120
20
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
AD104
Oland PRO
(215-0837015)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7