Home Comparison Radeon R7 240 vs Arc A380

Radeon R7 240 vs Arc A380

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 6GB VRAM Arc A380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 163% (2050MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
499
Arc A380 +741%
4198

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
1024
20
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.397 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.198 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1050 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
DG2-128
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net