Radeon R7 240 OEM vs FireGL V5600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
200 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 89W)
FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (35.20GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 OEM
+159%
499
FireGL V5600
192
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Aug 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
3
320
Shading Units
120
20
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
31.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
89W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
