Home Comparison Radeon R5 M330 vs RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

Radeon R5 M330 vs RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M330 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R5 M330 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 50W)
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 105% (2115MHz vs 1030MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M330
659
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +1871%
12990

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
Crystal System
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

955 MHz
Base Clock
1635 MHz
1030 MHz
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
320
Shading Units
3072
20
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
20.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
659.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
41.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Exo
GPU Name
AD107
Exo PRO
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.69 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
56 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net