Radeon R5 230 OEM vs Moore Threads MTT S3000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 230 OEM and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R5 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
3936 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 230 OEM
200
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+7680%
15560
Graphics Card
Dec 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
32
160
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
256
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
5.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
19W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Caicos
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Caicos PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
22 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
5.0
Shader Model
6.5
