Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Radeon R9 360 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1219MHz vs 1050MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 85W)
Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1248
Radeon R9 360 OEM
+29%
1613
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
May 2015
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
925 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
12
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Lexa
GPU Name
Tobago
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.3
