Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs GeForce GTX 960
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1219MHz vs 1178MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 120W)
GeForce GTX 960 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.2GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1248
GeForce GTX 960
+93%
2413
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon Pro WX 2100
934
GeForce GTX 960
+146%
2300
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Radeon Pro WX 2100
282
GeForce GTX 960
+263%
1025
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
Jan 2015
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
925 MHz
Base Clock
1127 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.2GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.70 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
75.39 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.413 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
75.39 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
120W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Lexa
GPU Name
GM206
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
GM206-300-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
