Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1219MHz vs 1032MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 134W)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1248
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
+27%
1585
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
Mar 2013
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
925 MHz
Base Clock
980 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
144.2GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
Theoretical Performance
19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.51 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.05 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.585 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.05 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
134W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Lexa
GPU Name
GK106
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
GK106-240-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Kepler
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1