Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs GeForce 210 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
GeForce 210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
+3465%
1248
GeForce 210 OEM
35
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
Sep 2009
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
512
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
31W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Lexa
GPU Name
GT216
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
