Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs FirePro W7000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
FirePro W7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1248
FirePro W7000
+94%
2432
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
20
512
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Lexa
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
