Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Radeon Instinct MI325X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 1000W)
Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
17152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5728
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+1326%
81720
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Oct 2024
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
304
2304
Shading Units
19456
144
TMUs
1216
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
1000W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
153 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.7
Shader Model
N/A
