Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores
NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+5628%
5728
NVS 310
100
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
2304
Shading Units
48
144
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GF119
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1