Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce GTX 760 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 760 X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1072MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+131%
5728
GeForce GTX 760 X2
2470
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Nov 2013
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1072 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
1152
144
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.73 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.9 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.470 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
102.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GK104
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
GK104-225-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Kepler
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1