Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+171%
5728
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
2108
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
960
144
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.96 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.84 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.108 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GK106
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Kepler
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
