Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (90W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+101%
5728
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
2849
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Jun 2020
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2304
Shading Units
896
144
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
90W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
TU106
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6