Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+726%
5728
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
693
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
May 2013
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
384
144
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.216 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.86 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
692.7 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.86 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GK208
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
GK208-301-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1