Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce GT 620
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2208 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+2029%
5728
GeForce GT 620
269
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
May 2012
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2304
Shading Units
96
144
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
49W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GF108
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
GF108-100-KB-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Fermi
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1