Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 38.02GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+3877%
5728
GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
144
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Dec 2008
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.02GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
2304
Shading Units
48
144
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
G94B
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
