Radeon Pro 560 vs Radeon R7 A265
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 560 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro 560 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (81.28GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Radeon R7 A265 's Advantages
Boost Clock825MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 560
+193%
1858
Radeon R7 A265
633
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Jan 2014
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
825 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
81.28GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
16
Compute Units
6
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
58.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
1.858 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.858 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
116.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Polaris 21
GPU Name
Opal
Polaris 21 XT
(215-0908004)
GPU Variant
Opal XT
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
